Sunday, February 28, 2010

Transformed and Transforming


A Sermon for Transfiguration Sunday and Family Dedication
Luke 9:28-43

Until we arrive in the gospels at the stories of Christ’s resurrection and ascension, no gospel passage lifts Christ up for praise more powerfully than the one in front of us this morning, the story of the transfiguration. And yet, it is a puzzling and mysterious passage. Jesus and Peter and John and James go up on a mountain to pray. And while the four of them are praying, the three disciples begin to fall asleep, that common, narcoleptic tendency among Jesus’ disciples. (These days it tends to happen during the sermons instead of the prayers, but maybe it’s because we pray shorter prayers these days). Peter and John and James are aroused from their stupor to see a glow-in-the-dark Jesus speaking with two men that have been dead for centuries, the great law-giver Moses and the great prophet Elijah.

It is a puzzling and mysterious scene. Since the early centuries of the church, commentators have tried to make sense of it in various ways. Some have said it is so puzzling and mysterious that it must have been a dream; they were falling asleep after all. Others have said it is a vision like the vision of Isaiah the prophet in Isaiah 6. Some have said it is a story of the appearance of Jesus to the disciples after his resurrection that has been moved back earlier in the gospel to prepare the readers for that glorious occasion of resurrection and ascension. Some commentators have gone so far as to say that it is a creation of the imagination of the early church in order to glorify Christ or to make the point that the teachings of Christ belong side-by-side with the law and with the prophets of the Jewish Bible.

To this day, we don’t know quite what to make of this puzzling and mysterious scene, and for me, here’s why. You would think that this mountaintop experience of Peter and John and James who saw Christ as no one had seen Christ before would somehow have changed or transformed them. You would expect, wouldn’t you, that an experience with Jesus like this would change everything for the three disciples who saw it and heard it, who were there when it happened. It was a glorious moment, no? Jesus’ appearance changed, and his clothing became dazzling white, and the three disciples saw their mentor and friend “transfigured” and chatting it up with the two greatest heroes of their faith. They saw Jesus as no one had seen Jesus before. But it didn’t change a thing. It didn’t change a thing.

This story of the transfiguration is reported in Mark and Matthew and Luke, but it is never mentioned again. It is never even alluded to, hinted at, anywhere else in those gospels. It is exactly as it is said in verse 36: they told no one anything of what they had seen. How could they not? How could you not leak at least a little bit of it? How could you see Christ on a mountaintop as no one else had seen Christ before and walk away from it in silence as though it had never happened? This silence of the gospels is puzzling. We are told that John was one of the three disciples who was there, who experienced it firsthand, but the gospel of John does not tell the story at all. How could John the Beloved have been there for something so amazing and astonishing and not even mention it? How could the Johannine tradition be silent when the synoptics put John on the mountaintop for the transfiguration? The silence of the gospel of John is puzzling. Nowhere in the apostolic preaching in the book of Acts is the transfiguration mentioned. According to Acts, when the early preachers went out, they told the story of the history of Israel and the story of God’s love and redemption in the story of Jesus, but they never mentioned the transfiguration. The apostolic silence is puzzling. And the disciples: they’re no different after the transfiguration than they were before it. The very next passage in this morning’s gospel lesson from the Revised Common Lectionary shows us that the disciples were no more faithful, no more effective, no more understanding of Jesus than they were before their mountaintop experience. Even the disciples who had been to the mountaintop with Jesus still didn’t get it. The silence of the disciples’ lives is puzzling, don’t you think?

Decades ago, Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel taught us in a song to pay attention to the sound of silence, “of people talking without speaking, of people hearing without listening.” It was a song of darkness and light, a song the words of which are every bit as puzzling and mysterious as the story of the transfiguration. Some of you are old enough but young enough to remember how Simon and Garfunkel called us in their song to listen, to listen to what is “whispered in the sound of silence”: “The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls and tenement halls and whispered in the sound of silence.” How do we make sense of the silence of the gospels and the apostolic preaching and the evidence of the disciples’ lives? I’d like to suggest this morning, as we think especially on this day about nurturing our children, children of our families and children of this congregation in the gospel and the faith and practice of the Christian life, it is the silence to which we should listen and from which we should learn.

First, look at Peter’s enthusiastic mistake in verse 33. On rousing from his stupor, Peter says to Jesus, “Lord, it is good that we are here in this place. Let’s build three booths, one for Moses and one for Elijah and one for you. Let’s build a shrine on the mountaintop in this place where it is good to be!” Alan Culpepper, Dean of the McAfee School of Theology in Atlanta and a wonderful New Testament interpreter and theologian says that the mistake Peter made was that he wanted to “freeze the moment and commemorate the place.” In his enthusiasm for what he experienced, he wanted to “freeze the moment and commemorate the place.” Alan says that’s always a mistake when it comes to understanding the gospel of Jesus Christ because the gospel of Jesus Christ does not call us to a shrine on a mountaintop or a sanctuary in Greenville, South Carolina, for that matter. The gospel of Jesus Christ brings us to places of experience of the presence of God like that mountaintop and like this sanctuary, and then it turns us to the task of answering the call that God has for us at the foot of the mountain, on the plain and in the valley.

The gospel is not about freezing the moment and commemorating the place, and neither is rearing our children. How often we try to do it! In pictures and moving pictures, in memories, in hopes and aspirations, we try to freeze the moment and commemorate the place when the task is not on the mountaintop at all. The task in rearing our children is preparing them for the way, preparing them for the foot of the mountain, for the plains and for the valleys. A mountaintop experience is wonderful, you see, but it doesn’t change a thing. What transforms lives is the everyday and the ordinary, the mundane: every act of relationship at the foot of the mountain, on the plains and in the valley. We should learn that from the silence. Christ’s disciples are not called to freeze the moment or commemorate the place of the transfiguration because Christ calls them and us to live the gospel in the everyday, the ordinary, the every act of relationship with children and spouse and parents and family and strangers and enemies, with brothers and sisters in Christ and those who are all around us. Of course, it’s good to be here. It’s good to praise and worship and adore; but it’s even better, having done so, to come down the mountain and head for the plain and go through the valleys faithfully.

That's where we are called to live out the story of Christ’s life with the announcement to every person we meet, “You are a beloved child of God!” (v 35), “God loves you!”—even those who are foaming at the mouth (v 39), even those whom we might see or portray and speak of as though they possessed by a demon (v 42). The silence of the gospels tells us that authentic transformation is not a mountaintop experience that changes everything. Authentic transformation is about your every day, about your every interaction, your ordinary and your mundane.

[Piano vamp on “I Want to Go” begins.] It’s about the way we bring our children up, bring them up in church even when they don’t want to be here. It’s the way we bring our children up as youth. It’s the way our children go off to college. It’s the way they marry and become parents or the way they don’t marry and still become parents to children all around them. It’s the way we age, not on the mountaintop but at the foot of the mountain and in the valley. It’s our faithfulness from the cradle to the columbarium that again and again we say not, “Lord, take me to the mountaintop so I can see Jesus as no one has seen Jesus before!” but as we say, “I want to go, Lord. I want to go, Lord. I saw just enough of Christ among the people here that I want to go where you are going, Lord.” That’s authentic transformation. [Kyle Matthews sings “I Want to Go.”] Amen.


This material is Copyrighted © 2010 by Jeffrey S. Rogers. It may be copied or disseminated for non-commercial use, provided this notice is included. The author can be contacted at jeffrogers110@bellsouth.net.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Do you think it is biblical to announce to every person we meet (unless they are born-again Christians), "You are a beloved child of God?" If so, how do you explain the following verses:

- But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name (John 1:12)

- By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother. (1 John 3:10)

While every person was created in the image of God, wouldn't you agree that every person is not a child of God? (For example, are Jehovah's Witnesses children of God, even though they deny the deity of Jesus Christ?) And if every person is not a child of God, why would a Christian choose to deceive someone in need of God's grace and mercy?

Thank you for the response.

Jeff Rogers said...

Good question! Thanks for your patience with my very slow response, as I wanted to take it as seriously as it was asked.

The first part of my response is quite easy: this sermon was delivered in the context of the worship of God by a congregation whose Mission Statement begins, “We are a community of believers in God as revealed in Jesus Christ as Lord.” While it is true that on any given Sunday morning, the congregation at worship may include a variety of visitors and interlopers who are not among “the people of God at First Baptist Greenville,” I am disinclined to be concerned about “children of the devil” being among those to whom I preach in this place, notwithstanding the all too obvious sins (of which I am aware, at least) of the congregation of First Baptist Greenville. So, the sermon was intentionally addressed to those whom John 1:12 says have become “children of God.”

The second part of my response is harder: I confess that I hold out hope for a wider pronouncement of blessing and inheritance for more children rather than less, grounded in Paul’s challenging words to those who would have excluded others in the first century when he wrote to the church in Rome that God “has mercy on whomever he chooses. . . . As indeed he says in Hosea, ‘Those who were not my people I will call “my people,” and her who was not beloved I will call “beloved.”’ ‘And in the very place where it was said to them, “You are not my people,” there they shall be called children of the living God’” (Romans 9:18,25-26). If, indeed, that morning at First Baptist Greenville there were undeserving souls who were called “children of God,” then that was “the very place” where those who were “not beloved” were prophetically called “beloved,” and those who were not the Lord’s people were called “children of the living God.” I’ll gladly err on the side of Hosea.

If nothing else, that pronouncement of blessing planted a seed of the gospel to which I hope and pray they will eventually respond. Certainly, I think, they are far more likely to respond in faith to God in Jesus Christ by being reminded that God has called them to be God’s own than by pronouncing them “children of the devil.” The latter is almost always a self-fulfilling prophecy.